The AI Legal Assistant Grounded in Your Country’s Law.
Research, drafting and document analysis for lawyers in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and South Africa, grounded in your own jurisdiction’s judgments and statutes.
Zero fabricated citations, every authority is linked
Research and drafting completed in minutes, not hours
What it can do
Five things lawyers use it for
What to ask for, and how to ask so you get the most back.
01
Draft from the material you already have
Submissions, applications, affidavits, pleadings and letters — written from your facts and your own documents, with the authorities woven in.
Attach the witness statements and say who you act for, and it builds cross-examination or exam-in-chief questions out of what each witness actually said.
Upload a filing you were happy with and it drafts in that structure and tone, instead of a house style you then have to rewrite.
What you ask
Draft written submissions for the respondent in an unfair termination claim. Our replying affidavit and the claimant’s submissions are attached — set out the issues for determination and argue each one in FIRAC. 2 documents attached
A structured draft you can edit, with every authority it relies on linked.
02
Answer a question of law
Doctrine or procedure, answered from the judgments and statutes themselves. Every authority is linked, so you can check it before you rely on it.
Name the court and the stage you have reached. Procedure turns on both, and the answer narrows to the one you are actually in.
Ask how a particular judge has handled the issue and it answers from that judge’s own decisions.
What you ask
Do you need leave to file a reference on taxation from the Chief Magistrate’s Court to the High Court?
The position, the decisions that set it, and the passages they turn on.
03
Find support for a proposition
When you have already written the line you need to prove, hand it over and get the authorities that carry it.
Paste the sentence you intend to file, not the topic it sits under. You get the cases that carry that exact proposition.
Name the authority you had in mind and it will tell you if it does not hold the point, then find one that does.
What you ask
Find authorities for the proposition that interest on taxed costs runs from the date of the certificate of taxation, not from the date of judgment.
Cases on the point, each with the passage that says it.
04
Critique a document
Yours or the other side’s. Where it is weak, what it leaves out, and what to file in response.
Attach both sides’ papers together and say what you are worried about, and it answers against the case actually being made rather than in the abstract.
Ask it to check that every case you have cited supports the point you are citing it for — before it is filed, not after.
What you ask
Read my submissions and tell me which arguments are weakest. Where a cited case does not support the point it is used for, say so and give me one that does. 1 document attached
The weak points named, and better authority where yours does not hold.
05
Find an authority
A case and what has happened to it since, or a statute and how the courts have applied it.
Paste a citation on its own to pull the judgment, or ask what has happened to it since and you get the appeals and the decisions that followed it.
For a statute, ask how the courts have applied a section rather than what it says, and the answer comes back as decisions.
What you ask
Which decisions have applied the exhaustion requirement under the Fair Administrative Action Act where the tribunal never issued a formal decision?
The decisions on point, with their history and how they have been treated since.
Verified Sources
Every authority we surface has a link. No fabricated citations. Ever.
AI hallucination is a real professional risk. Citing a nonexistent case is embarrassing at best, and a serious professional conduct issue at worst. JuriBase AI solves this structurally: every authority in every response is a real, retrievable case or statute from the jurisdiction you’re researching, linked directly. Your reputation is safe.
Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and South Africa. Your research is grounded in your own jurisdiction’s judgments and legislation, and draws on decisions from the other jurisdictions where they are persuasive in yours. Every authority is linked so you can check it before you rely on it.
How does JuriBase prevent AI hallucination?
Every authority in a JuriBase response is retrieved from our database of real judgments, statutes, and determinations, and linked directly in the response. We do not allow the AI to generate citations from memory; every authority must be retrievable and linked. If it doesn't exist in our database, it won't appear in your memo.
What sources does JuriBase cover?
JuriBase covers the authoritative sources lawyers in Kenya, Uganda, Tanzania and South Africa rely on: each country’s case law, its constitution, Acts of Parliament and subsidiary legislation, and in Kenya, ODPC determinations too. Your research is grounded in your own jurisdiction, and decisions from the others are drawn on where they are persuasive. Every authority used is linked.
Can I cancel my subscription anytime?
Absolutely. You can cancel at any time with no hidden charges. Your access continues until the end of your current billing period.
How secure is my research data?
Your data is encrypted and stored securely using industry-standard protocols. Only you can access your saved cases, folders, and documents. We have strict privacy policies and never share your data with third parties.
Do I need technical training to use JuriBase?
No. If you can type a question, you can use JuriBase. The interface is designed to be immediately familiar to any lawyer, no technical background required.
